What Is an Answer?

Imagine you just received a Utah Divorce Complaint from your spouse.

You’re understandably nervous because probably don’t know what to do. How do you respond? Do you have to respond? What does a response look like?

Maybe you take to the internet and figure out you have to file what’s called an Answer. But what is an Answer, really?

In essence, an Answer is a set of reactions to the allegations and requests your spouse made in the Divorce Complaint.

In an Answer, you either “admit” or “deny” each separate allegation and request made.

And when I say each separate allegation and request, I mean it. If you do not address each allegation and request, a judge will assume you admit that allegation or are okay with that request.

Answers require pretty specific language so you are clear about what you are denying and what you are admitting. Here is a sample of the language we use in our Answers (keep in mind: you, as the answering party, are the Respondent):

Admit All

Respondent admits the claims and allegations contained in ¶ X of the Divorce Complaint.

Admit All (Multiple Subparts)

Respondent admits the claims and allegations contained in ¶ X and subparts X(x) through X(x) of the Divorce Complaint.

Admit Part, Deny Part

Respondent admits (explain what is admitted), but denies all other allegations contained in ¶ X of the Divorce Complaint.

Admit Part, Deny Part (Multiple Subparts)

Respondent admits the claims and allegations contained in ¶ X and subparts X(x) through X(x) of the Divorce Complaint. Respondent denies the claims and allegations contained in ¶ X(x) of the Divorce Complaint.

Deny All        

Respondent denies the claims and allegations contained in ¶ X of the Divorce Complaint.

Deny All (Multiple Subparts)

Respondent denies the claims and allegations contained in ¶ X and subparts X(x) through X(x) of the Divorce Complaint.

Without Knowledge

Respondent is without knowledge sufficient to either confirm or deny the claims and allegations contained in ¶ X of the Divorce Complaint; and, therefore, denies them.

Legal Conclusion

The allegations contained in ¶ X of the Divorce Complaint represent a legal conclusion and not an allegation of fact; and Respondent, therefore, denies the allegations.

Exhibits

Respondent denies the claims and allegations contained in Exhibits X-X.

Prayers for Relief

Respondent denies Petitioner’s Prayers for Relief X-X.

Hope that helps explain what an Answer is and the type of language and structure it requires.

For more on what happens once a Divorce Complaint is filed in Utah, read here.

Protect Your Money And Your Family

We remove fear associated with divorce, protect your money & maximize time with your kids!

We're here to help. Let's determine your best options.

Call Us 24//7 at 801-685-9999 to Speak with a Live Representative

Utah Divorce FAQs
Top 100 Divorce Blog
What Clients Are Saying…
BrownLaw icon
Excellent
Brown Family Law
Based on 980 reviews
I would highly recommend Clay to anyone! He is absolutely amazing and keeps you updated and informed with everything going on with your case!
Paul is a first-class attorney who not only has the skill to stand up for justice and guide your case to a successful resolution, but also demonstrates genuine care for his clients. A truly unique presence in his field.
Clay Randle at Brown Family Law is a master of clarity in the midst of complexity.

I hired Clay to help me navigate a divorce involving contested marital and premarital properties spread across multiple states. The legal terrain was anything but simple. Valuation disputes, and emotionally charged negotiations. Clay handled it all with precision, professionalism, and a calm that made a difficult process feel manageable.

What stood out most was his ability to distill complicated legal issues into clear, actionable steps. He was responsive, strategic, and always one step ahead in anticipating challenges. I never felt lost in the process—Clay made sure I understood my options and the implications of every decision.

If you’re facing a divorce with significant property concerns —Clay is the kind of attorney who brings both legal rigor and human empathy. I’m grateful for his guidance and would recommend him without hesitation.
Dani was very knowledgeable. She answered all my questions in timely manner. Would highly recommend working with her!
Paul Waldron offers a competent and mindful approach to navigating family law. Thank you Paul for being an asset in our community that we can all depend on.
Clay really knows how to take care of his clients!
Clay is one of the most knowledgeable attorneys I’ve talked to. He has a great grasp of family law and is an amazing advocate.
I send all my family law clients to Clay. As a lawyer myself, I know how important good representation is. Clay honestly cares about his clients and is a very good strategist. He’s also really funny.
Clay is an amazing, compassionate, and talented lawyer. Highly recommend him and the firm.
David and Dani were very helpful and made my case as stress free as possible.
yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7

Categories

Related Posts