Who Is a “Cohabitant” in Utah Protective Orders?

Definitions

A definition in the law is a funny thing because it doesn’t need to actually make any sense.

For example, I once saw a definition of “sexual violence” at a university that included “withholding communication” from a significant other.

Now, everyone knows not communicating with someone cannot possibly, by any stretch of the human imagination, be “sexual violence.” But, that’s the definition they went with anyway.

Another example: if you want to define white as black and day as night in a law, you can. That’s how arbitrary definitions can be.

Definition of “Cohabitant” in Utah Protective Orders

Utah laws contain some interesting definitions. Perhaps none more interesting than “cohabitant” in Utah’s Cohabitant Abuse Act.

Now, the Cohabitant Abuse Act is important because it’s where most Utah protective orders come from. So, if you want to know who you can get a protective order against, this definition is very important.

Here’s the definition:

(2) “Cohabitant” means an emancipated person pursuant to Section 15-2-1 or a person who is 16 years of age or older who:

(a) is or was a spouse of the other party;

 

(b) is or was living as if a spouse of the other party;

 

(c) is related by blood or marriage to the other party;

 

(d) has or had one or more children in common with the other party;

 

(e) is the biological parent of the other party’s unborn child; or

 

(f) resides or has resided in the same residence as the other party.

 

(3) Notwithstanding Subsection (2), “cohabitant” does not include:

(a) the relationship of natural parent, adoptive parent, or step-parent to a minor; or

 

(b) the relationship between natural, adoptive, step, or foster siblings who are under 18 years of age.

Got that? If you don’t, don’t worry. It’s complicated.

Examples of “Cohabitants” for the Purpose of Obtaining a Utah Protective Order

Here are some examples of cohabitants in Utah protective orders.

I’ll start out with the most common examples:

  1. People who have lived together as boyfriend and girlfriend or husband and wife. (How long they have to have lived together gets tricky.)
  2. People who have had a child together.
  3. People who are or were married — even if they aren’t married anymore.

Here are some of the less common examples:

  1. People who live as spouses, even if they never legally married or live under the same roof.
  2. Brothers-in-law (they’re related by marriage).
  3. Fourth cousins who have met each other once (they’re related by blood).
  4. People who saw each other once, had a one night stand, and the woman is pregnant.
  5. College roommates who haven’t seen in twenty years (they resided together).
  6. A pregnant surrogate who was implanted with someone else’s genetic child (she’s the biological parent of someone else’s unborn child).

I could go on, but you get the point.

When you get down to the nitty-gritty, lots of people related (by circumstance or blood) in lots of weird ways can get a protective order in Utah.

Who Usually Gets a Protective Order?

By far the most common “cohabitants” getting protective orders in Utah are people who live together in a romantic relationship, whether that be marriage or just living together.

The next most common are people who used to be married or in a romantic relationship, and they get in a violent fight after they break up.

These are really the types of folks the Cohabitant Abuse Act was meant to protect. The definition cohabitant just happens to include lots more types of folks.

Protect Your Money And Your Family

We remove fear associated with divorce, protect your money & maximize time with your kids!

We're here to help. Let's determine your best options.

Call Us 24//7 at 801-685-9999 to Speak with a Live Representative

Utah Divorce FAQs
Top 100 Divorce Blog
What Clients Are Saying…
Brown Family Law
Excellent
4.8
Based on 806 reviews
I would hands down suggest Brown Family Law. Nathaniel helped me with my divorce, and he was very knowlegeable and knows his stuff. He helped me file a motion, get somethings changed in the original decree, helped me understand the terms they use, helped me understand how child support is calculated along is all the financial aspects associated with divorce case. He also is very responsive to phone calls and emails which was very helpful whenever I had small questions. Thank you Nathaniel!
Response from the owner: Andrew, thank you for your kind words.
I can’t say enough good things about Brown Family Law, but more specifically, my lawyer David Handy and his paralegal Dani. They are kind and honest and always available to me when I’ve needed them! This is such an exhausting time and they alleviated all of my stress by taking control. I could trust the process knowing I was in great hands!!! The entire law firm works as a team to take care of you! I can’t recommend them enough! Thank you!!!
Response from the owner: Ryan, so glad David and Dani served you so well and alleviated your stress.
They handled my case with the highest degree of professionalism and integrity and made every effort to be efficient and transparent with me throughout the whole process. I was told that they were the best as far as family law is concerned and I believe that praise was fully justified.
Response from the owner: Ben, thank you.
Amber McFee is always professional and great to work with. Being opposing counsel by nature is adversarial, but Amber is professional in approach while effectively advocating for her clients. She will treat you right!
Response from the owner: Thank you, Jonathan.
Overall from start to finish the best experience to have dealing with a time that is difficult.Andrew Christensen is very professional and out going to make this situation the best it could be and worked hard to make sure the divorce was fair for me.Over all, this firm really cares and treats you as a family or friend and just not a client, down to Marco Brown taking time to see how I was doing and offer to help in any way possible during my divorce while I was there for my first initial meeting.I would highly recommend anyone that has to go through a divorce to really reach out to the Brown Family Law firm and see for your self the experience I was able to receive from a top notch law firm.
Response from the owner: Devin, thank you for the kind words. Andrew appreciated the opportunity to help you with your situation.
Sophie was very helpful and explains the process and fees. Thank you!
Response from the owner: Corey, thank you for the kind words. Glad we could help.
Dani always kept me updated and has great communication skills.
Response from the owner: Thank you, Sofia.
Dani was extremely helpful and always responsive.
Response from the owner: Glad Dani did well for you.
My experience with Brown Family Law is a positive one. I highly recommend them. This firm has very good communication with their clients. Attorney Paul Waldron represents me and I’m very happy with the experience. My questions and concerns are always answered quickly and respectfully. I’m grateful to have Mr. Waldron and Brown Family Law in my corner during this difficult time for my family.
Response from the owner: Jodie, glad we were able to communicate with you so effectively and quickly. Thank you for your kind words.
I recently used Clay in a divorce case and could not have been happier. He was efficient, knowledgeable, and made me feel like I was his only client. The process was easy and he was always there to reassure me or help me with decisions. I would highly recommend Brown Family Law.
Response from the owner: Thank you, Mendi.
js_loader

Categories

Related Posts