Hearings Before Commissioners as an Alternative to Trial

There are times when you just don’t want to go to trial. Well, unless your masochistic or a vindictive jerk, you almost never want to go to trial. Trials are difficult. They cost a lot. They cause massive amounts of stress. They put everything else in the office on hold. And, oddly, from a business standpoint, they don’t bring in a lot of money. There is a reason only 2%-3% of cases go to trial.

Usually, you wrap up cases through informal negotiations or in mediation. (Our mediation success rate is around 80%.) Sometimes, even after hours and hours and negotiating, you just can’t quite resolve everything in mediation. We all dread those mediation in which everything is resolved except two or three relatively minor issues. It doesn’t make any sense to go to trial and spend all that money on such small-ball stuff, but you just can’t get to a full agreement. What to do?

Something I’ve done a few times is to agree to hold a hearing on the remaining disputed issues and then accept the commissioner’s recommendations regarding those issues. The recommendations then become part of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the final Order. I usually title the subsequent motion “Motion for Additional Orders,” and I explain in the motion what exactly we’re doing so the commissioner knows what’s going on.

Here are some of the advantages of this hearing approach: (1) you get in to court for a hearing with the commissioner far faster than going to trial; (2) a proffer hearing is much easier to prepare for than trial; (3) a hearing with the commissioner takes far less time than a trial; (4) hearings are less stressful, for both clients and attorneys, than trial; (5) hearings are cheaper than trials.

There are a couple potential problems with the hearing-as-alternative-to-trial approach.

First, commissioners aren’t judges. They make decisions without all the information a trial would elicit. This means the hearing approach is better suited to issues that are not particularly difficult. Minor child support disagreements and disagreements about the right of first refusal or parental discipline are perfect examples of issues that can be addressed under the approach.

Second, if your issue is too complicated, the commissioner may punt on the issue and make you go to trial. I recently had this happen with Commissioner Casey in Farmington. The issue before him was relatively high dollar ($20,000+) and the stories were completely divergent. He told us he couldn’t make a solid decision based on proffer (credibility was a major issue), so we would need to take that issue to trial. On a side note: Dillon made recommendations on three other more minor issues; so, even in front of Dillon (a rules hawk) this approach can be used successfully.

So, while there is some risk a commissioner will make you go to trial on more complicated issues, the hearing alternative is a potential tool to help minimize costs and save time in those cases where a very few minor issues are standing between you and resolution of the case.

Protect Your Money And Your Family

We remove fear associated with divorce, protect your money & maximize time with your kids!

We're here to help. Let's determine your best options.

Call Us 24//7 at 801-685-9999 to Speak with a Live Representative

Utah Divorce FAQs
Top 100 Divorce Blog
What Clients Are Saying…
BrownLaw icon
Excellent
Brown Family Law
Based on 980 reviews
I would highly recommend Clay to anyone! He is absolutely amazing and keeps you updated and informed with everything going on with your case!
Paul is a first-class attorney who not only has the skill to stand up for justice and guide your case to a successful resolution, but also demonstrates genuine care for his clients. A truly unique presence in his field.
Clay Randle at Brown Family Law is a master of clarity in the midst of complexity.

I hired Clay to help me navigate a divorce involving contested marital and premarital properties spread across multiple states. The legal terrain was anything but simple. Valuation disputes, and emotionally charged negotiations. Clay handled it all with precision, professionalism, and a calm that made a difficult process feel manageable.

What stood out most was his ability to distill complicated legal issues into clear, actionable steps. He was responsive, strategic, and always one step ahead in anticipating challenges. I never felt lost in the process—Clay made sure I understood my options and the implications of every decision.

If you’re facing a divorce with significant property concerns —Clay is the kind of attorney who brings both legal rigor and human empathy. I’m grateful for his guidance and would recommend him without hesitation.
Dani was very knowledgeable. She answered all my questions in timely manner. Would highly recommend working with her!
Paul Waldron offers a competent and mindful approach to navigating family law. Thank you Paul for being an asset in our community that we can all depend on.
Clay really knows how to take care of his clients!
Clay is one of the most knowledgeable attorneys I’ve talked to. He has a great grasp of family law and is an amazing advocate.
I send all my family law clients to Clay. As a lawyer myself, I know how important good representation is. Clay honestly cares about his clients and is a very good strategist. He’s also really funny.
Clay is an amazing, compassionate, and talented lawyer. Highly recommend him and the firm.
David and Dani were very helpful and made my case as stress free as possible.
yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7

Categories