No-Fault vs. At-Fault Divorce

No-Fault vs. At-Fault Divorce

The main difference between a no-fault and an at-fault divorce lies in the reasons for  the divorce.

The Difference Between Fault and No-Fault Divorce

No-Fault Divorce

In a no-fault divorce, a spouse does not have to prove that the other spouse was at fault. It is sufficient to state that the marriage is not working because of one or more of the following reasons:

  1. The spouses are incompatible.
  2. There are irreconcilable differences in the marriage.
  3. The marriage has irretrievably broken down.

The courts do not require the petitioning spouse to provide proof about what went wrong in the marriage.

The spouse who is served with the divorce petition cannot object to the divorce itself. If he/she does object to the fact a divorce was filed, the court will simply consider the case to be a divorce by “irreconcilable difference.” However, in rare cases, where the evidence is compelling, the courts may investigate further.

The spouses are required to live separately for a specified period before filing for divorce in a no-fault divorce state. This period is also referred to as the “cooling off” period.

At-Fault Divorce

An at-fault divorce requires the petitioner to allege marital wrongdoing or offense on the part of the other spouse, and provide evidence for it.

Potential Reasons for At-Fault Divorce

  • Bigamy
  • Adultery
  • Fraudulently or forcefully getting married
  • Abandoning the spouse without reason
  • Abuse (emotional or physical)
  • Addiction
  • Impotence
  • Incurable mental illness
  • Any other reason specified by the state

The courts require the alleging spouse to provide evidence of the wrongdoing. An at-fault divorce process can be marred by acrimony, lies, investigations, deception, and false counter-allegations. The courts can take a long time to resolve at-fault divorce cases.

The courts provide the other spouse an opportunity to provide counterevidence for the allegations of marital wrongdoing. In very rare cases, the other spouse may admit to wrongdoing but still defend his behavior by proving that the alleging spouse condoned his/her behavior, connived with him/her in his/her wrongdoing or triggered the wrongdoing, or provoked him/her into committing a marital offense. Defending marital offenses requires witnesses, documentation, investigations, etc. Often, at-fault divorces take a long time to complete and are expensive. Therefore, at-fault divorces are rarely alleged.

Other factors to Consider

As of 2021, just 19 U.S. states are truly no-fault divorce states. A spouse cannot file for an at-fault divorce in these states.

All other states follow the at-fault divorce rule but allow spouses to file a no-fault divorce petition. A spouse can choose to file an at-fault or no-fault divorce in an at-fault divorce state depending upon the circumstances that led to divorce.

Everyone filing for a divorce, be it a no-fault divorce or an at-fault divorce, is required to fulfill their state’s residency requirements.

An at-fault divorce takes time and costs much more than a no-fault divorce, which is simpler and more affordable.

Another at-fault vs no-fault divorce factor to note is that states that follow the at-fault divorce rule allow spouses to file a no-fault divorce petition. However, states that follow the no-fault divorce allow a spouse to file an at-fault divorce petition only in rare cases.

Protect Your Money And Your Family

We remove fear associated with divorce, protect your money & maximize time with your kids!

We're here to help. Let's determine your best options.

Call Us 24//7 at 801-685-9999 to Speak with a Live Representative

Utah Divorce FAQs
Top 100 Divorce Blog
What Clients Are Saying…
BrownLaw icon
Excellent
Brown Family Law
Based on 946 reviews
Jennifer and Dani did a wonderful job handling my case. The communication and accessibility were top notch.
Brown Family Law is very professional. They use their phenomenal expertise to manage every case with care. I would highly recommend them.
Response from the owner:Thank you, Kim. Glad we could help.
Very thorough and on top of dates and timing for various documents.
My attorney Andrew Christensen was great! He was very helpful while being realistic and upfront with me at the initial consultation. He did a great job of guiding me and answering any questions I had throughout the whole process. My paralegal Carren Leavitt was also very helpful. I appreciated her weekly check-ins, for the aid she provided, and the questions answered.
Clay Randle provided exceptional support and counsel. He was patient, knowledgeable, and thoughtfully addressed my many questions and concerns. Thank you very much!
Paul and Dani were incredibly communicative, educational, willing to work with our unique circumstances, and took the whole process from complicated and overwhelming to simple. Highly recommend!!
Nathaniel was very personable and listened. He is also incredibly knowledgeable, effective, and efficient. Brown Family Law is a pinnacle of law firms.
I highly recommend Nathaniel Garrabrandt and Brown Family Law. If you are going through a divorce and your parental rights are being falsely challenged they are a great option. Nathaniel and Brown family law are professional, very knowledgeable, and know how to navigate within the broken and biased Utah family law court system. They were highly communicative throughout the process. They can potentially save you a lot of time and money if lawfare is being waged against you.
Could not help with my case but referred me to someone who could .
Clay Randle was great and I would highly recommend him for an attorney.
yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7

Categories