What Is A Lawyer For A Child Called?

What Is A Lawyer For A Child Called?

There are three types of lawyers that a court can appoint for a child:

  1. Amicus attorney
  2. Attorney ad litem
  3. Guardian ad litem

The courts may appoint an attorney for the child in any of the following circumstances:

  1. When they find that the parents, guardian, or state representatives do not represent the child’s best interests.
  2. If the case is about termination of parental rights.
  3. If the case is filed by a government agency like the CPS (Child Protective Services).

The rules related to the appointment of an attorney by the courts for a child may vary between states. Here are some details:

1. Amicus Attorney

  • An amicus attorney is appointed by the courts to provide themselves with legal services and help them ensure that the child’s best interests are protected in a custody case.
  • The amicus attorney does not advise the child on the custody case, and therefore, the attorney does not have an attorney–client relationship with the child.
  • However, the amicus attorney may share confidential data/information about the case with the child in certain circumstances and with the court’s approval.
  • The amicus attorney recommends the best path to follow to protect the child’s best interests even if the child does not agree with the attorney’s suggestions.

2. Attorney Ad Litem

  • The attorney ad litem is appointed by the courts to represent the child, maybe for a specific part of the case – for example, the child abuse part of the divorce case or maybe the termination of parental rights part of the case.
  • This attorney provides the child with legal services and must do what his client desires – i.e., he has an attorney–client relationship with the child.
  • If the child is unable to decide or is vague about his/her goals, then the attorney ad litem should do what he/she feels is right in the child’s best interests.
  • The attorney ad litem is the third attorney in the case, with one attorney representing the father and another attorney representing the mother.
  • The attorney ad litem must be loyal to the client (the child) and do everything to the best of his/her ability to help his client, the child, succeed. He/she can call witnesses (including the parents), examine them, object to statements made by other witnesses if they relate to the part of the case he was appointed for, and more.

3. Guardian Ad Litem

  • A guardian ad litem (GAL) is a neutral investigator/protector appointed by the courts to protect the child’s best interests.
  • Depending on the state, the GAL represents the child’s best interests, not the child. In some states, the GAL represents the child’s wishes, not necessarily the child’s best interest. The idea is that in representing the child, the court will gain the information necessary to make a decision regarding what is in the child’s best interests.
  • To ensure the child’s best interests, the GAL usually starts by arranging a physical and psychological examination of the child to figure out if the child is fit to make decisions. He/she submits this report along with his opinion.
  • If a guardian is proposed for the child, the GAL investigates whether the proposed guardian can serve the child’s best interests.
  • The GAL has the authority to make emergency medical decisions and he/she can petition the courts to issue emergency or interim orders until a guardian is appointed for the child.
  • The GAL investigates what is and isn’t in the best interests of the child. He/she then recommends the course of action to the courts.
  • The GAL is often dismissed after the investigation is completed and the report is filed, although, many times the GAL will continue representing the child through trial.

The difference between an attorney ad litem and a guardian ad litem is that while the attorney ad litem represents the child legally, the GAL acts as the witness in place of the child.

The courts may appoint both an attorney ad litem and a GAL for the child, but one attorney cannot assume both roles.

After the attorneys are appointed by the court, they are likely to, depending on their roles as described above, meet and interview the child privately, get access to the child’s records (medical, school, etc.), be present at hearings, investigate the child’s best interests, interview people who are involved in the child’s life (parents, grandparents, child care professionals, teachers, doctors, etc.), visit the child’s home/school and interview people who are acquainted with the child, and do other tasks in the child’s best interests.

Summing up, the GAL does a more comprehensive investigation than the other court-appointed attorneys.

Protect Your Money And Your Family

We remove fear associated with divorce, protect your money & maximize time with your kids!

We're here to help. Let's determine your best options.

Call Us 24//7 at 801-685-9999 to Speak with a Live Representative

Utah Divorce FAQs
Top 100 Divorce Blog
What Clients Are Saying…
BrownLaw icon
Excellent
Brown Family Law
Based on 964 reviews
Clay was great to work with! He was very willing to explain everything I needed to know and helped me understand the options on my case. Very easy to work with.
Jennifer and Dani, as well the rest of the team went above and beyond when it came to my case.
I would highly recommend ‘Brown Family Law’.
My experience with them was exceptional.
Alija
Loved working with Daniel and the whole team. Great service.
Marco and his team at Brown Family Law have created nearly the perfect system for getting divorced in Utah. From the initial intake, to gathering all of the necessary documentation, to the client communication in between. There is so much work that goes into getting divorced, but with Marco and his team you'll always know where you are in the process and what happens next, which is such a comfort. Would highly recommend.
I would give them 10 stars if I could. Clay was professional and super organized. He took the time to explain everything. I would highly recommend him for any family law needed. Melanie was a godsend. She not only kept me continually informed of the progress, she sent texts of encouragement and support throughout the entire process. I would give her 100 stars for going above and beyond to make this experience less stressful. Her encouragement and genuine caring were comforting and calming. The entire staff at Brown Law are on your side and if you are lucky enough to get Clay and Melanie on your team you will not be disappointed. Thanks! Mack M.
Response from the owner:Wow, thank you so much. Melanie is great. Glad she helped you so well.
Nathaniel was an incredible partner throughout the divorce process. He was organized, responsive and respectful of my wishes while simultaneously giving me guidance and advice. I would recommend him to anyone.
I couldn’t have made it through my divorce without Clay and his team! I am forever thankful for the hours and time spent with me to help navigate an extremely difficult time in life. They’re reliable, knowledgeable, and know how to get things moving in an efficient manner. Nothing but good to say here!!
Working with Daniel Young at Brown Family Law was a truly positive experience during one of the most difficult times of my life. From the start, Daniel was knowledgeable, compassionate, and incredibly responsive.
If you need a family law attorney who combines expertise with empathy, I cannot recommend Daniel Young enough. He is a true advocate and a credit to Brown Family Law.
Nathaniel and Carren have been absolutely incredible to work with. They kept me informed and in the loop throughout each step of the process. They always answered every question I had in a very quick and timely manner. I could not recommend them more.
This 5-star review is for Nathaniel Garrabrandt at Brown Family Law. Nathaniel was just what we needed. He helped guide us with a level of professionalism, efficiency, and genuine care that made a real difference during a challenging time. He is always thoughtful and respectful, and he never makes you feel like just another case. His communication was clear (with regular check-ins), his advice was solid and uncomplicated, and I always felt that he had his client's best interest at heart as he made suggestions. I’m grateful to have had such a capable and compassionate attorney to work with. You hope you never need these kind of services, but when you do, you want the best... and someone with high integrity. Nathaniel truly deserves all 5 of these stars, in every way.
yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7

Categories