What Is Imputation of Income and what Does It Have to Do with Utah Divorce?

When you think of the word “income,” you probably think about actual money you earn from a job.

That makes sense, and that’s what income means most of the time.

Sometimes in Utah divorces, however, income isn’t income because it’s imputed income.

What Is Imputed Income?

Imputed income is income someone should earn but doesn’t.

Let’s use an example to explain things.

Husband and Wife are getting divorced. Four years ago, Wife worked for a bank and made $50,000 per year. She quit her job to stay home with the baby, so she hasn’t work for four years. The court could impute Wife income based on the idea she could go back to work and make $50,000 per year since she did it before. So, $50,000 would be Wife’s imputed income.

That’s the essence of imputed income.

Why Do Courts Impute Income?

Courts impute income for three main reasons:

  1. Children need support from both parents, so the court isn’t going to allow one parent to put an undue burden on the other parent by working less or taking a cruddy, lower-paying job.
  2. Alimony is based on true need, not on the luxury of not working or working less than reasonably possible.
  3. You can’t get out of paying support and alimony because you decide you want to work less or take a lower paying job.

When Do Courts Impute Income?

Courts will impute income to a person when the court believes a person is voluntarily underemployed.

Whether people like it or not, everyone has to work full-time after a divorce. Dads have to work. Moms have to work. Even moms who haven’t worked for years have to work.

You can count on working forty hours per week if you’re getting divorced.

So, if a husband doesn’t want to forty hours per week, but prefers to work twenty-five, the court will impute him income based on what he would make if he worked forty hours per week.

On the other hand, if a wife doesn’t want to go back to work because she would prefer to stay at home with the kids, the court will impute her at the wage she would make if she were to work a full-time job.

When Do Courts not Impute Income?

In my experience, courts are reluctant to impute income in Utah divorce when:

  1. Working a forty-hour-week doesn’t make sense because income from the job would be so low it wouldn’t cover daycare and other expenses.
  2. The person to be imputed income is disabled or otherwise unable to work (e.g., does not have a U.S. work permit).

What Income Do Courts Usually Impute?

I’d say more than 80% of the time, courts will impute people at minimum wage — i.e., $1257 per month in Utah.

Why minimum wage and not more?

Minimum wage is the most commonly imputed income for a simple reason: people who are imputed income in Utah divorces usually haven’t been working for a while.

For example, lots of stay-at-home moms are imputed minimum wage because they’ve been stay-at-home moms for sevens or ten years, and they simply don’t have many job force skills that would allow them to make much money.

By contrast, if you have a job and make more than minimum wage, which is most people getting divorced, then there is no need for imputing income because there is an actual income on which you can based child support and alimony.

How Can You Prove Someone Is Voluntarily Underemployed?

If imputing income is based on someone being voluntarily underemployed, how do you go about proving that?

Here are the most common ways:

  1. Show that what the person makes now is significantly lower than what they made in the recent past.

If a husband had a $100,000 job, then quit at the beginning of the divorce and took a $50,000 year job, it’s pretty likely he’s underemployed.

Not every situation is as clear cut as the example above, but you get the general idea.

  1. Show there is no disability that would keep the person from making more money.

We encounter many situations in which someone says they’re injured or disabled and can’t make what they should make or used to make. Problem is they have no diagnosed injury or disability.

What we do in situations like this is to gather evidence demonstrating they are not injured or disabled, which means they are free to make more money.

  1. Hire an expert to show that the person can make much more money than they are making now.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, people going through divorce will minimize their skills and experience and make less money than they could, all in an attempt to pay less in child support and alimony — or to receive more child support and alimony.

When there is a real question about how much someone can make based on their work history, education, and job skills, we hire an expert to make a determination regarding how much money someone can and should make.

This expert is called a vocational evaluator, and can be invaluable depending on the situation.

Protect Your Money And Your Family

We remove fear associated with divorce, protect your money & maximize time with your kids!

We're here to help. Let's determine your best options.

Call Us 24//7 at 801-685-9999 to Speak with a Live Representative

Utah Divorce FAQs
Top 100 Divorce Blog
What Clients Are Saying…
BrownLaw icon
Excellent
Brown Family Law
4.8
Based on 920 reviews
Marco is beyond insightful!
Great support, Russell and Connor were amazing and got my case dismissed in only 2 months. Great communication with weekly calls. Easy to work with and were very conscious on not overspending my budget. Great team.
Response from the owner:Daniel, thank you for the kind words, and happy Russell and Connor did well for you.
Anne Greyson long was great to work with she really listens and fights for her clients thank you so much for all your hard work
Response from the owner:Thank you, Heather. Glad Anne-Greyson helped you so well.
You get what you pay for, and the Brown Family team is worth every penny. We truly appreciated their team-based approach, making sure that every detail of our case was thoughtfully handled. They were incredibly easy to work with, kept us informed throughout the process, and made sure no question ever went unanswered. By far the best family attorneys I’ve worked with, and the only ones I’ll call if I ever need legal help again.
Response from the owner:Chris, thank you. Glad we were able to guide you through your process.
Andrew made the whole process smooth and quick! Kept me updated on any changes, and followed up with me constantly!

Made me feel at ease throughout the whole process and made sure I felt seen/ heard!
Response from the owner:Joselyn, thank you for the kind words.
David Handy is my attorney and he is excellent. He understands my cases and is well informed to defend my needs and the needs of my kids. He is supportive and compassionate. Telling me how things are and what to expect. He does very well with my high conflict cases (protective order and divorce). I highly recommend him and the Brown Family Law firm. Everyone I have talked to is helpful. Especially Conor Schetzel who is currently the paralegal on my cases.
Response from the owner:Suzanne, thank you and glad David has taken care of you.
Nathaniel Garrabrandt and Brown Family Law is where I send people who are seeking Divorce. Highly professional and compassionate. Thank you!
Response from the owner:Jaren, thank you for the referrals.
I cannot say enough good about my experience with Brown Family Law. Ray Hingson and paralegal Carren did an excellent job with my case. I will definitely use this firm again for any legal issues.
Response from the owner:Meghann, so glad Ray and Carren took good care of you.
I have worked with Andrew Christensen many times in a variety of situations. I am very impressed with his friendly demeanor in a difficult situation. I would highly recommend him to you without any reservations.
Response from the owner:Thank you, Monica.
Highly recommend Brown Family Law. Life is hard, divorce is harder, and Andrew Christensen is your guy to help you through to the other side.
Response from the owner:Mike, thank you for the kind words and the referrals.
yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7

Categories