Who Is a “Cohabitant” in Utah Protective Orders?

Definitions

A definition in the law is a funny thing because it doesn’t need to actually make any sense.

For example, I once saw a definition of “sexual violence” at a university that included “withholding communication” from a significant other.

Now, everyone knows not communicating with someone cannot possibly, by any stretch of the human imagination, be “sexual violence.” But, that’s the definition they went with anyway.

Another example: if you want to define white as black and day as night in a law, you can. That’s how arbitrary definitions can be.

Definition of “Cohabitant” in Utah Protective Orders

Utah laws contain some interesting definitions. Perhaps none more interesting than “cohabitant” in Utah’s Cohabitant Abuse Act.

Now, the Cohabitant Abuse Act is important because it’s where most Utah protective orders come from. So, if you want to know who you can get a protective order against, this definition is very important.

Here’s the definition:

(2) “Cohabitant” means an emancipated person pursuant to Section 15-2-1 or a person who is 16 years of age or older who:

(a) is or was a spouse of the other party;

 

(b) is or was living as if a spouse of the other party;

 

(c) is related by blood or marriage to the other party;

 

(d) has or had one or more children in common with the other party;

 

(e) is the biological parent of the other party’s unborn child; or

 

(f) resides or has resided in the same residence as the other party.

 

(3) Notwithstanding Subsection (2), “cohabitant” does not include:

(a) the relationship of natural parent, adoptive parent, or step-parent to a minor; or

 

(b) the relationship between natural, adoptive, step, or foster siblings who are under 18 years of age.

Got that? If you don’t, don’t worry. It’s complicated.

Examples of “Cohabitants” for the Purpose of Obtaining a Utah Protective Order

Here are some examples of cohabitants in Utah protective orders.

I’ll start out with the most common examples:

  1. People who have lived together as boyfriend and girlfriend or husband and wife. (How long they have to have lived together gets tricky.)
  2. People who have had a child together.
  3. People who are or were married — even if they aren’t married anymore.

Here are some of the less common examples:

  1. People who live as spouses, even if they never legally married or live under the same roof.
  2. Brothers-in-law (they’re related by marriage).
  3. Fourth cousins who have met each other once (they’re related by blood).
  4. People who saw each other once, had a one night stand, and the woman is pregnant.
  5. College roommates who haven’t seen in twenty years (they resided together).
  6. A pregnant surrogate who was implanted with someone else’s genetic child (she’s the biological parent of someone else’s unborn child).

I could go on, but you get the point.

When you get down to the nitty-gritty, lots of people related (by circumstance or blood) in lots of weird ways can get a protective order in Utah.

Who Usually Gets a Protective Order?

By far the most common “cohabitants” getting protective orders in Utah are people who live together in a romantic relationship, whether that be marriage or just living together.

The next most common are people who used to be married or in a romantic relationship, and they get in a violent fight after they break up.

These are really the types of folks the Cohabitant Abuse Act was meant to protect. The definition cohabitant just happens to include lots more types of folks.

Protect Your Money And Your Family

We remove fear associated with divorce, protect your money & maximize time with your kids!

We're here to help. Let's determine your best options.

Call Us 24//7 at 801-685-9999 to Speak with a Live Representative

Utah Divorce FAQs
Top 100 Divorce Blog
What Clients Are Saying…
BrownLaw icon
Excellent
Brown Family Law
Based on 946 reviews
Jennifer and Dani did a wonderful job handling my case. The communication and accessibility were top notch.
Brown Family Law is very professional. They use their phenomenal expertise to manage every case with care. I would highly recommend them.
Response from the owner:Thank you, Kim. Glad we could help.
Very thorough and on top of dates and timing for various documents.
My attorney Andrew Christensen was great! He was very helpful while being realistic and upfront with me at the initial consultation. He did a great job of guiding me and answering any questions I had throughout the whole process. My paralegal Carren Leavitt was also very helpful. I appreciated her weekly check-ins, for the aid she provided, and the questions answered.
Clay Randle provided exceptional support and counsel. He was patient, knowledgeable, and thoughtfully addressed my many questions and concerns. Thank you very much!
Paul and Dani were incredibly communicative, educational, willing to work with our unique circumstances, and took the whole process from complicated and overwhelming to simple. Highly recommend!!
Nathaniel was very personable and listened. He is also incredibly knowledgeable, effective, and efficient. Brown Family Law is a pinnacle of law firms.
I highly recommend Nathaniel Garrabrandt and Brown Family Law. If you are going through a divorce and your parental rights are being falsely challenged they are a great option. Nathaniel and Brown family law are professional, very knowledgeable, and know how to navigate within the broken and biased Utah family law court system. They were highly communicative throughout the process. They can potentially save you a lot of time and money if lawfare is being waged against you.
Could not help with my case but referred me to someone who could .
Clay Randle was great and I would highly recommend him for an attorney.
yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7

Categories

Related Posts